Fresno, CA: River City
August 31st, 2010There are lots of cities that are synonymous with water: Venice with its canals, New York has the Hudson, Honolulu and the ocean.
But most people probably don’t think of Fresno as a “water town.” We only get 11 or 12 inches of rain a year after all. We are actually considered a semi-arid desert. So how can Fresno be a “river city”?
It turns out the the San Joaquin River, the river that gave it’s name to the entire Valley, flows down from the mighty Sierra right past Fresno on its way to the Pacific Ocean. If it were running, it would be the fourth largest river in the state.
But in 1947, or there ’bouts, the river got turned off. Up until then, you could catch salmon in the San Joaquin River. After a while, people started to think, “Well, that’s just the way it is.” The San Joaquin was more useful as a canal than a river, after all, and who’s gonna miss a few fish?”
All my life I’ve heard people put Fresno down, but I don’t think I ever got the connection. I never thought that maybe one of the reasons people didn’t like Fresno was because we turned off a river. If you think about it, people need water; we’re magnetically drawn to rivers and lakes and oceans. They not only symbolize life, the provide it. So if you turn off a river, it’s bound to have some negative effects.
A couple weeks ago, a group called “Revive the San Joaquin” held a festival at Lost Lake Park, just north of Fresno. It was really no surprise that many in attendance had never been to the park, a beautiful spot on the banks of the San Joaquin River. Why would you go to a river park that didn’t have a river? It dawned on me that the reason many who had come this day was simple: the water was back.
The decision to return the water to the river may not be popular in the agricultural community. It’s a tricky issue for sure which may be difficult to understand especially in the light of our current economic struggles. I’ve certainly had questions about the wisdom of turning off the pumps to save the little delta smelt. The agony that it caused seemed out of proportion to the good achieved.
But bringing back the San Joaquin River is akin to creating a national park, only more difficult. Becuase as humans, we have a very difficult time turning around, even when we know we’re going the wrong direction.
For a long time, we thought we needed to conquer nature as if nature was our enemy. Now we realize we need nature to survive and we need to learn to live in harmony with nature or things may not work out so well for us. For those who have worked to bring back the San Joaquin, it must have seemed an insurmountable stuggle, and we owe them all, not just for this river, but what the struggle has tought us about the true value of nature.
The San Joaquin River and all rivers, should be cherished and preserved and not seen as merely a resources or highways of commerce. They are so much more.
–Mark Alvis



